Price and Quantity Measurements: Theoretical Biases in Empirical Procedures

Price and Quantity Measurements: Theoretical Biases in Empirical Procedures
Nitzan, Jonathan. (1989). Working Papers. Department of Economics. McGill University. Vol. 89. No. 14. pp. 1-24. (Article - Working Paper; English).

Full Text Available As:
Cover Image

Download (47kB) | Preview
PDF (Full Text)

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract or Brief Description

The presence of qualitative changes in the nature of many commodities hinders our ability to construct meaningful price and quantity indices. This paper assesses some of the quality-change literature that seeks to resolve this problem. Several writers have endeavoured to develop objective, theory-neutral procedures designed to measure qualitative changes in some timeless, quantitative units. These measures, they argued, could be used to properly adjust ordinary price and quantity statistics for distortions introduced by quality changes. A careful examination suggests, however, that such procedures are neither objective nor free of theoretical biases. First, all existing attempts to develop ‘objective’ commodity measures in the presence of quality changes are besieged by a constant resort – explicit or implicit – to ‘subjective’ considerations. Second, both the idea that quality can be measured and the methods developed for that purpose are closely tied with the neoclassical theoretical paradigm, particularly with its emphasis on perfect competition and equilibrium.



Publication Type

Article - Working Paper


consumption equilibrium hedonic index hedonic regression measurement national accounting neoclassical economics perfect competition price quality change technology


BN Theory
BN Data & Statistics
BN Value & Price
BN Production
BN Methodology
BN Growth

Depositing User

Jonathan Nitzan

Date Deposited

11 Feb 2007

Last Modified

21 Dec 2015 20:38


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item