CasP's 'Differential Accumulation' versus Veblen's 'Differential Advantage'

CasP's 'Differential Accumulation' versus Veblen's 'Differential Advantage'
Bichler, Shimshon and Nitzan, Jonathan. (2018). Working Papers on Capital as Power. No. 2018/08. November. pp. 1-9. (Article - Working Paper; English).

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full Text Available As:
[img]
Preview
Cover Image
20181100_bn_casp_da_vs_veblen_da_wpcasp_front.jpg

Download (8kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Full Text)
20181100_bn_casp_da_vs_veblen_da_wpcasp.pdf

Download (299kB) | Preview
[img] Other (Full Text)
20181100_bn_casp_da_vs_veblen_da_wpcasp_web.htm

Download (82kB)

Alternative Locations

https://www.academia.edu/37869184/CasPs_Differential_Accumulation_versus_Veblens_Differential_Advantage, https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/189830, http://www.capitalaspower.com/2018/11/2018-08-bichler-nitzan-casps-differential-accumulation-versus-veblens-differential-advantage/

Abstract or Brief Description

This paper clarifies a common misrepresentation of our theory of capital as power, or CasP. Many observers tend to box CasP as an ‘institutionalist’ theory, tracing its central process of ‘differential accumulation’ to Thorstein Veblen’s notion of ‘differential advantage’. This view, we argue, betrays a misunderstanding of CasP, Veblen or both. As we show, CasP’s notion of differential accumulation is not only different from, but also diametrically opposed to Veblen’s differential advantage. Veblen, who wrote at the turn of the twentieth century, before the appearance of business indices and financial benchmarks, emphasized the absolute drive for ‘maximum profit’ and saw strategic sabotage merely as a power means to an economic end. By contrast, CasP, which was developed at the end of the twentieth century, sees power not only as a means of accumulation, but also – and perhaps more importantly – as its ultimate purpose. Accumulators, it argues, are conditioned and driven to augment not their profits and assets as such, but their relative power, and this means that, as symbolic bearers of power, these profits and assets should be measured not absolutely, but relatively to those of others – hence the imperative of differential accumulation.

Language

English

Publication Type

Article - Working Paper

Keywords

capital as power differential advantage differential accumulation Thorstein Veblen

Subject

BN Methodology
BN Power
BN Region - North America
BN Theory
BN Value & Price
BN Business Enterprise
BN Capital & Accumulation
BN Distribution

Depositing User

Jonathan Nitzan

Date Deposited

27 Nov 2018 03:48

Last Modified

30 Dec 2018 03:34

URL:

http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/id/eprint/565

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item